HOME PAGE
 Eras of Life
 Dinosaur Evolution
 Feathered Dinosaurs
 Tyrannosaurs

Ancestors

  Introduction
  Herrerasaurus
  Eoraptor
  Coelophysis
  Eustreptospondylus

Species  

  Albertosaurus
  Alectrosaurus
  Alioramus
  Daspletosaurus
  Dilong
  Eotyrannus
  Gorgosaurus
  Nanotyrannus
  Tarbosaurus
  Tyrannosaurus
  Other Tyrannosaurs

New Discovery

  Guanlong Wucaii

Information

   Anatomy
   Hunter v Scavenger
   Family Life
   Growth Rate
   Exhibits
 Weird Dinosaurs
 Prehistoric Sea Monsters
 Pterosaurs
 Sauropods

 

 

Tyrannosaurus Hunter versus Scavenger

  Experts continually debate where the tyrannosaurs were hunters, scavengers opportunistic feeders.  The discussion about the feeding patterns of T. rex and other large carnivorous dinosaurs remains active. Most paleontologists have portrayed them as highly active predators, while others see them as obligate scavengers (Lambe 1917; Colinvaux 1978; Halstead and Halsted 1981; Barsbold 1983; Horner and Lessem 1993; Horner 1994; Horner and Dobb 1997). The scavenger hypothesis has been re-proposed by Jack Horner in the 1990s and appeared in Horner's 1993 book "The Complete T. rex". 

Predator Argument

      The ocular cavities of Tyrannosaurus are positioned so that the eyes would point forward, like a lion or a human. A scavenger rex would not need the advanced depth perception that stereoscopic vision allows. Stereoscopic vision is essential for predatory animals who catch other animals (owls for example), but has secondary importance for animals who are chased (such as rabbits or deer).
    T. rex had an incredibly large and powerful jaw with serrated teeth, one bite could break most anything in half.  This was a terrible weapon.  Certainly if T. rex was a scavenger, it would not have to be so well armed..
   There were also the large powerful legs.  Some scientists believe that T. rex could run as fast as 30 miles per hours.  This ability would prove very helpful to a predator chasing prey.  It was not needed by a scavengers whose meal was already dead and just waiting to be devoured. 

Scavenger Argument

    Some scientists think that T-Rex didn't chase down its prey at all, but was merely a scavenger. As a scavenger he fed off of already dead animals, killed by old age, disease, or other carnivores,
  Paleontologist Jack Horner of the Museum of the Rockies is leading proponent of the theory that T. rex could not have been a predator. He maintains that its eyes were too small to see distant prey; its arms were too small to hold victims; and that is huge legs would have resulted in it moving slowly.  He also points out that its large olfactory lobes provided it with an acute sense of smell.  Vultures also have large olfactory lobes which they use to smell dead bodies at great distance.
    There is no fossil evidence for predation.  Bones have been found with tyrannosaur teeth embedded in them or scratched by them, but there is no evidence to show that the animals were not already dead.  A bone that showed evidence of a healed tyrannosaur bite would be strong evidence for predation.

Speed

    Horner's main argument, which is generally agreed upon, is that T. rex was a slow walker and not a runner. Therefore, Horner said, it is more likely to be a scavenger. However, predators do not necessarily have to be swift. Speed can be measured in some ways, using an analogy with living animals and sports (the femur/tibia ratio), using biomechanics, or using footprints (trace fossils). For instance, bicyclists with longer thighs are said to have better endurance. Horner claims that the femur (thigh bone) to tibia (shin bone) ratio (>1, like in almost all large theropods) suggests a specialized walker, rather than a runner.  Thus it was a slow scavenger rather than a fast running predator. However, T. rex's legs were better designed for speed than its probable prey.
    Another argument from Jack Horner regarding T. rex's slow speed are its useless forelimbs mentioned above. It could not catch itself, should it fall over in a high speed hunt, (and perhaps sustain severe injuries due to its heavy skull size) and would therefore have to play it safe by walking rather than running. This claim has been substantiated by Farlow et al. (1995): they used a mathematical model using impact forces and decelerations for an animal weighing 6000 kg to gauge that a fall at very high speed (20 m/s or 72 km/h, the top speed used in most models) would kill it. They speculate a top speed of adult individuals of about 10 m/s (36 km/h).
     The claim that T. rex's legs were not suitably adapted for high speed is an important point independent of the predator/scavenger debate. A paper in Nature (Hutchinson amd Garcia 2002) Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner used a mathematical model (based on chickens and alligators) to gauge the leg muscle mass needed for some top speeds. They found that some proposed top speeds (40 km/h or 25 mph, or even 72 km/h or 45 mph) are quite unfeasible, because they require very large leg muscles (needing ~86% of total body mass as leg muscles). They specify a very rough upper estimate of 18 km/h or 11 mph.
    However, those figures depend on the popular assumption that T. rex weighed around 6-8 tons. Some have suggested that "T. rex" may have weighed a mere four tons, since its bones were rather hollow and its breathing style would have required less mass. This would probably result in a much higher top speed. Even if T. rex or other large theropods were rather slow (as argued by Farlow et al. 1995; Hutchinson and Garcia 2002), it does not necessarily mean they were incapable of hunting prey. The dinosaurs they probably hunted were likely even slower, and ambush tactics cannot be ruled out.
    However, the fact that T. rex had longer femurs and legs than other theropods points to the fact that T. rex could indeed reach higher speeds than implicated. Secretary birds had long femurs and legs to improve the distance covered by each step, so even when taking a "slow pace" T. rex would still be moving 12 to 15 mph (the speed of a sprinting human). (Hutchinson and Garcia 2002) The mathematical model of chickens and alligators was not an accurate parallel of T. rex in most respects. For one thing, T. rex was a bipedal carnivore (unlike alligators), and the skeletal structure was more streamlined to decrease wind resistance (unlike chickens). The most important point is that no person in this time has examined the muscle structure of the T. rex, so one cannot be completely sure of the speed of T. rex.

Opportunist

    Other scientists argue that scavenging for food and hunting aren't mutually exclusive activities and T-Rex might have done both depending on what was easiest. Such is the case with lions in modern Africa. They hunt when they have to, but are happy to steal a carcass from a smaller predator, like the hyena, when they can.
    They point out that its panoramic vision and great sense of smell would aid both a predator and a scavenger.  As far as the lack of a fossil bone showing a healed T. rex bite, one asked, "What is going to survive a T. rex bite?" 
     There it not enough evidence exists to say for sure how T. rex earned its daily bread.  Most paleontologists believe that tyrannosaurs were eating machines that would consume protein where they could find it.
 

 

Poster is available at
www.Edugraphics.net

 
Rockets-2-Go.com
 
Edugraphics.Net | Feenixx Publishing |